<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com">
<title>Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology current issue</title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>November 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1756-283X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/377?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tag.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology</title>
<url>http://tag.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the time is now!]]></title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaira, D., Zullo, A., Hassan, C., Fiorini, G., Vakil, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:37:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756283X09343326</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the time is now!]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>322</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endoscopic resection with ligation using a multi-band mucosectomy system in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Background: Endoscopic therapy for early neoplasia in Barrett&rsquo;s esophagus (BE) is evolving. Endoscopic resection has an increasing role. We wanted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multi-band ligation/resection [ER-L] without pre-injection in BE with high-grade dysplasia [HGD] and intramucosal carcinoma [IMCA].</p><p>Methods: A cohort of 65 consecutive patients from a single academic medical center, who underwent ER-L as part of endoscopic eradication therapy for BE with HGD/IMCA were studied. ER-L was performed after endoscopic mapping and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Subsequently, adjunctive ablative therapies including photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation and radiofrequency ablation were applied to achieve complete eradication of all BE. Thereafter biopsy surveillance was performed per protocol. All patients were prescribed a proton-pump inhibitor. Main outcome measurements: Change in histopathological stage; eradication of BE and HGD/IMCA; adverse events.</p><p>Results: The median number of ER-L applications in each session was 4 (range 1-6) and the mean total number of ER-L sessions was 1.5. Compared with prior forceps biopsy, histopathology from the ER-L specimen changed in 24 (37.5%, p =&lt;0.0001). With median follow-up of 15 months (range 8-42), complete and durable BE eradication was achieved with ER-L alone in 36 (60%) and the remainder with adjunctive ablation therapies. There were nine complications (four (6%) acute bleeding, five (7.5%) strictures, zero perforations).</p><p>Conclusions: ER-L without submucosal (SM) pre-injection is safe and effective when applied selectively for eradication of BE with HGD/IMCA. There is significant change in pathological stage after ER-L conferring a diagnostic and staging advantage. ER-L may be used adjunctively with ablation therapies.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhat, Y. M., Furth, E. E., Brensinger, C. M., Ginsberg, G. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:37:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756283X09346794</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endoscopic resection with ligation using a multi-band mucosectomy system in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>330</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Second-line rescue therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection]]></title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Helicobacter pylori infection is the main known cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease and gastric cancer. After more than 20 years of experience in H. pylori treatment, however, the ideal regimen to treat this infection has still to be found. Nowadays, apart from having to know well first-line eradication regimens, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (overall) eradication rate. The choice of a &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; treatment depends on which treatment is used initially. If a first-line clarithromycin-based regimen was used, a second-line metronidazole-based treatment (quadruple therapy) may be used afterwards, and then a levofloxacin-based combination would be a third-line &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; option. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that levofloxacin-based &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, with the advantage of efficacy, simplicity and safety. In this case, quadruple regimen may be reserved as a third-line &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; option. Finally, rifabutin-based &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical fourth-line strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and levofloxacin. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H. pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; therapies are consecutively given. Therefore, the attitude in H. pylori eradication therapy failure, even after two or more unsuccessful attempts, should be to fight and not to surrender.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gisbert, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:37:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756283X09347109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Second-line rescue therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>356</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel lesions with Crohn's disease using double-balloon endoscopy]]></title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>With the recent development of double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE), it has become possible to observe the entire small bowel endoscopically. DBE enables us to make detailed observations and at the same time takes biopsy samples. Single-balloon endoscopy (SBE), which has a balloon only at the tip of the overtube, has also been introduced. Since DBE and SBE are similar in the concept of insertion method, a general term &lsquo;balloon-assisted endoscopy&rsquo; (BAE) is used when referring to these methods. Characteristic small bowel lesions observed with BAE in Crohn&rsquo;s disease are aphthoid ulcers, round ulcers, irregular ulcers and longitudinal ulcers. These ulcers tend to be located on the mesenteric side of the small bowel. Since BAE can determine the location (mesenteric or antimesenteric side) of the ulceration, it is useful in distinguishing Crohn&rsquo;s disease from other diseases that have ulcers in the small bowel. Strictures are a major clinical problem in the course of Crohn&rsquo;s disease. Traditionally, surgery was the main choice for small bowel strictures. In some cases, strictures located in distal ileum or proximal jejunum have been dilated using standard enteroscopes. DBE now enables balloon dilatation to be performed endoscopically even in the deep small bowel.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunada, K., Yamamoto, H., Yano, T., Sugano, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:37:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756283X09343542</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel lesions with Crohn's disease using double-balloon endoscopy]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>366</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review: Management of the returning traveler with diarrhea]]></title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/6/367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Traveler&rsquo;s diarrhea (TD) strikes 20&mdash;60% of travelers visiting developing countries. It occurs shortly after the return and can be distinguished into two categories: acute and persistent TD. Acute TD, mostly caused by bacterial and viral pathogens, is usually mild and self-limited, and deserves empirical symptomatic and/or antibiotic therapy in selected cases. Fluoroquinolones are progressively superseded in this indication by azithromycin, a well tolerated macrolide active against most bacteria responsible for TD, including the quinolone-resistant species of Campylobacter jejuni that are now pervasive, especially in Southeast Asia and India. Persistent TD in the returning traveler is much rarer than its acute counterpart and may be associated with three types of causes. Persistent infections, among which Giardia and possibly Entamoeba predominate, account for a significant proportion of cases. Postinfectious processes represent a second cause and comprise temporary lactose malabsorption and postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome, now considered a major cause of persistent TD. Finally, apparently unrelated chronic diseases causing diarrhea are occasionally unmasked by TD and represent a third type of persistent TD, among which the well established case of incident inflammatory bowel disease poses intriguing pathogenesis questions. This review discusses recent advances in the field and provides practical recommendations for the management of TD in adult, immunocompetent returning travelers.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Saussure, P. P. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:37:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756283X09346668</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review: Management of the returning traveler with diarrhea]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></title>
<link>http://tag.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/2/6/377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:37:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1756283X09353842</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledgements]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>